United States of America v. Ramiro Ramirez-Barreto, a/k/a Edward Lee Tijerna, a/k/a Ramon Ramirez Tapia, a/k/a…

24-6714Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29 de jan. de 2025

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6714
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RAMIRO RAMIREZ-BARRETO, a/k/a Edward Lee Tijerna, a/k/a Ramon Ramirez
Tapia, a/k/a Morelos,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Newport News. David J. Novak, District Judge. (4:19-cr-00047-DJN-LRL-1)
Submitted: January 23, 2025 Decided: January 28, 2025
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ramiro Ramirez-Barreto, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Ramiro Ramirez-Barreto appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a
sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the record and
conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by finding that even if
Ramirez-Barreto were able to establish an extraordinary and compelling reason for his
requested relief, the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors weighed against a sentence reduction. See
United States v. Malone, 57 F.4th 167, 172 (4th Cir. 2023) (stating standard of review for
denial of compassionate release).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Ramirez-Barreto,
No. 4:19-cr-00047-DJN-LRL-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 27, 2024). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.