Willie Orlando McKinnon v. Kimberly Brooke Cissel; Rachel Diane Morris

24-7188Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit4 de mar. de 2025

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-7188
WILLIE ORLANDO MCKINNON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KIMBERLY BROOKE CISSEL; RACHEL DIANE MORRIS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Brendan A. Hurson, District Judge. (1:24-cv-02809-BAH)
Submitted: February 27, 2025 Decided: March 4, 2025
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Orlando McKinnon, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Willie Orlando McKinnon appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii), 1915A(b)(2). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. McKinnon v. Cissel, No. 1:24-cv-02809-BAH (D. Md. Nov. 25, 2024). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.