25-1003•Emily Faith Fuller v. Jerrod Antonio Fuller
25-1003Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25 de ago. de 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1003
EMILY FAITH FULLER,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JERROD ANTONIO FULLER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Stephanie A. Gallagher, District Judge. (1:24-cv-02880-SAG)
Submitted: August 21, 2025 Decided: August 25, 2025
Before WILKINSON, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerrod Antonio Fuller, Appellant Pro Se. Emily Faith Fuller, Appellee Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jerrod Antonio Fuller seeks to appeal the district court’s orders remanding for lack
of jurisdiction Fuller’s family law action to the state court from which it was removed and
denying his motion for reconsideration. “[T]he law as it stands today provides that an order
remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal
or otherwise, except that an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was
removed pursuant to [28 U.S.C. §] 1442 or [§] 1443 . . . shall be reviewable by appeal or
otherwise.” BP P.L.C. v. Mayor & City Council of Balt., 141 S. Ct. 1532, 1536-37 (2021)
(cleaned up). The district court remanded the case to state court for lack of federal subject
matter jurisdiction, and removal was not premised on § 1442 or § 1443. We therefore are
without jurisdiction to review the remand order.
Accordingly, we deny Fuller’s motion for reconsideration and dismiss the appeal
for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.