Keara Holland v. Ally Bank

25-1688Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit4 de nov. de 2025

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1688
KEARA HOLLAND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ALLY BANK,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (6:25-cv-00705-BHH)
Submitted: October 30, 2025 Decided: November 4, 2025
Before RUSHING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keara Holland, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Keara Holland appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge, dismissing with prejudice Holland’s pro se civil complaint, and
denying Holland leave to amend the complaint. We have reviewed the record and discern
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Holland’s motion for summary disposition and
affirm the district court’s order. Holland v. Ally Bank, No. 6:25-cv-00705-BHH (D.S.C.
May 15, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.