United States of America v. LLOYD MACK ROYAL, III, a/k/a Blyss, a/k/a B, a/k/a Furious

25-6025Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit4 de mar. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6025
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LLOYD MACK ROYAL, III, a/k/a Blyss, a/k/a B, a/k/a Furious,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:09-cr-00048-TDC-1)
Submitted: February 26, 2026 Decided: March 3, 2026
Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lloyd Mack Royal, III, Appellant Pro Se. David Christian Bornstein, Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Lloyd Mack Royal, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We have reviewed the
record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Royal’s pending motions
and affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Royal, No. 8:09-cr-00048-TDC-1
(D. Md. Dec. 6, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.