25-6658•Weldon Eugene Holtzclaw, Jr. v. John Doe 1 Spinx Employee
25-6658Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29 de jan. de 2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6658
WELDON EUGENE HOLTZCLAW, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN DOE 1 SPINX EMPLOYEE; JOHN DOE 2 SPINX EMPLOYEE; JOHN
DOE 3 PICKENS COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICER; GREENVILLE COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; PICKENS COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT;
JOHN DOE 4; CASHIER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (6:25-cv-01294-DCC)
Submitted: January 22, 2026 Decided: January 29, 2026
Before AGEE, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Weldon Eugene Holtzclaw, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Weldon Eugene Holtzclaw, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil
action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Holtzclaw’s informal
brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir.
2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our
review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.