United States v. Jones

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
February 14, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-51211
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROY LEE JONES,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 1:03-CR-191-ALL
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Roy Lee Jones has filed a
motion to withdraw and brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jones has filed a response. Our
independent review of the brief, Jones’s response, and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Jones’s motion for the appointment of new
counsel is DENIED.

-- 1 of 1 --