United States v. Valdez

05-40507Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit18 de abr. de 2007

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
April 18, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-40507
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JESSE VALDEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:04-CR-492-1
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Jesse Valdez has filed a
motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Valdez has filed a response. Our
independent review of the brief, Valdez’s response, and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Valdez’s motion to strike the
Anders brief is DENIED. Valdez’s motion to proceed pro se is
also DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03
(5th Cir. 1998).

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.