Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Blake Keith Lewis

06-30317Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit12 de dez. de 2007

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-30317
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
BLAKE KEITH LEWIS
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 2:04-CR-20115-4
Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Blake Keith Lewis pleaded guilty to conspiracy to interfere with commerce
by robbery, interference with commerce by robbery, and two counts of use of a
firearm during a crime of violence. The district court sentenced Lewis to 60
months of imprisonment on the conspiracy to interfere with commerce charge
and 120 months of imprisonment on the interference with commerce charge, to
run concurrently, and 10 years on the first firearm charge and 30 years on the
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 12, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 06-30317
2
second firearm charge, to run consecutively to each other and to Lewis’s other
sentences.
Lewis argues that the district court erred in imposing a consecutive
sentence of 30 years of imprisonment on the second firearm charge pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(C)(i) because that provision requires an intervening
conviction between the commission of the prior and subsequent firearm-related
offenses and thus should not be applied to multiple § 924(c) convictions obtained
in the same proceeding. Lewis concedes that this issue is foreclosed by the
Supreme Court’s decision in Deal v. United States, 508 U.S. 129 (1993), but he
contends that he is raising the issue to preserve it for further Supreme Court
review.
As Lewis concedes, this issue is foreclosed. See Deal, 508 U.S. at 132;
United States v. Hebert, 131 F.3d 514, 525 (5th Cir. 1997).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.