06-30523•Summary Calendar KENNETH BRADFORD v. State of Louisiana
06-30523Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit9 de ago. de 2007
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
August 9, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-30523
Summary Calendar
KENNETH BRADFORD
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
STATE OF LOUISIANA
Defendant-Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana
USDC No. 3:06-CV-7
Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Kenneth Bradford, a Georgia prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders
remanding his Louisiana state criminal prosecutions to Louisiana state court
and denying reconsideration. The district court remanded the action after
determining that Bradford had failed to satisfy the procedural requirements of
28 U.S.C. § 1446 by filing an untimely notice of removal. See § 1446(c)(1).
Section 1446(c)(1) provides that a notice of removal of a criminal case must
“be filed not later than thirty days after the arraignment in the State court, or
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 06-30523
2
at any time before trial, whichever is earlier, except that for good cause shown
the United States district court may enter an order granting the defendant . . .
leave to file the notice at a later time.” Bradford does not challenge the district
court’s determination that his notice of removal was not filed within 30 days of
arraignment. Instead, Bradford argues that in the light of his allegations of civil
rights violations, including racial discrimination, by the State Attorney
General’s Office, the district court erred in dismissing his notice of removal and
remanding without conducting an evidentiary hearing. Because Bradford has
wholly failed to demonstrate good cause for filing an untimely notice of removal,
we find no error. See § 1446(c)(1).
The district court’s decision is AFFIRMED; motion for a stay of state court
proceedings DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.