Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Byron Chrisenberry

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-10946
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
BYRON CHRISENBERRY
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
Northern for the District of Texas
USDC No. 4:07-CR-3-14
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Byron Chrisenberry appeals his 240-month sentence following his guilty
plea for conspiracy to distribute and possess with the intent to distribute more
than 500 grams of methamphetamine. Chrisenberry avers that his sentence is
unreasonable because the district court failed to consider as required by 18
U.S.C. § 3553(a)(6) whether the sentence imposed resulted in an unwarranted
sentencing disparity between himself and his codefendants. Because the district
court correctly calculated and reviewed Chrisenberry’s guidelines range, the
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
August 22, 2008
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 07-10946
2
court “necessarily gave significant weight and consideration to the need to avoid
unwarranted disparities.” See Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586, 599 (2007).
The fact that Chrisenberry’s sentence was within the pertinent guidelines range
reduces this court’s concern with sentencing disparities to a “minimum.” See
United States v. Willingham, 497 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2007). Moreover, the
district court was aware of the sentences of the codefendants, who had
cooperated with the Government and received downward departures.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --