Summary Calendar ANNETTE LEWIS, Individually v. Pauline Igwe, d/b/a/ Human Services Center, and HARRIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-20100
Summary Calendar
ANNETTE LEWIS, Individually and as next friend of and as representative
of the estate of Toddrick Deon Lewis, deceased,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PAULINE IGWE, d/b/a/ Human Services Center, and HARRIS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Texas
4:05-CV-03320
Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges..
PER CURIAM:*
Plaintiff, Annette Lewis, challenges the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to defendant in this § 1983 case. The district court agreed
with and accepted the magistrate judge’s recommendations, concluding that
plaintiff failed to produce summary judgment evidence to allow a fact finder to
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 26, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 07-20100
2
find a causal link between a custom or policy of Harris County Department of
Education (HCDE) and any violation of federal law suffered by plaintiff’s son.
Plaintiff’s 21-year- old son Toddrick Lewis was a special education student
attending school at HCDE’s ABC West campus in Houston, Texas. This is a
school for mentally retarded and emotionally disturbed students. Toddrick
grabbed a meat patty off the plate of another student, placed it whole in his
mouth and began to choke. Several staff members responded by performing the
Heimlich maneuver and made other efforts to dislodge the food from Toddrick’s
throat but, unfortunately, were unsuccessful, and he died.
We affirm the district court’s judgment for the following reasons:
1. We agree with the magistrate judge and district court that appellant
has failed to demonstrate a policy, practice, or custom enacted or known to the
HCDE board that was causally related to Toddrick’s injury and death.
2. The district court did not err in declining to consider plaintiff’s
supplemental evidence that was not tendered to the magistrate judge before her
decision. Appellant never sufficiently explained her delay in obtaining and
submitting this evidence. See Freeman v. County of Bexar, 142 F.3d 848 (5th
Cir. 1998).
Therefore, for these reasons and those set forth in the careful November
2, 2006 Memorandum and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, we affirm
the district court judgment.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --