Alicia Williams v. Steak ‘nshake, Inc.

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 15a0792n.06
No. 15-5522
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
ALICIA WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STEAK ‘N SHAKE, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ON APPEAL FROM THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE WESTERN
DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
Before: GRIFFIN and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges; CLELAND, District Judge.*
KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal in which the appellant does not purport
to identify any error by the district court. Alicia Williams worked for Steak ‘N Shake for almost
seven years. Eventually they fired her. She brought this lawsuit pro se, asserting claims under
the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12112, and state law. The district court granted
summary judgment to Steak ‘N Shake on all of Williams’s claims because she had no evidence
to support them. Now represented by counsel on appeal, Williams does not identify any specific
error by the district court or even describe the actual proceedings below. Instead her brief to this
court is a meditation upon the putative injuries that court rules and procedures inflict upon pro se
litigants. Williams therefore provides us with no lawful basis upon which to grant her relief.
The district court’s judgment is affirmed.
* The Honorable Robert H. Cleland, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by
designation.

-- 1 of 1 --