United States v. Milo Davis

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-1101
___________________________
Cecilio Tamayo Contreras; Eva Yolanda Tamayo
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioners
v.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: November 7, 2013
Filed: November 8, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
El Salvadoran citizens Cecilio Tamayo Contreras and Eva Yolanda Tamayo
petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which
upheld an immigration judge’s (IJ’s) denial of special rule cancellation of removal
under the Nicaraguan and Central American Relief Act. After careful consideration,
we conclude that petitioners’ arguments regarding Contreras’s eligibility for special

-- 1 of 2 --

rule cancellation of removal are unreviewable. See Molina Jerez v. Holder, 625 F.3d
1058, 1068-69 (8th Cir. 2010). We further conclude that factual errors mistakenly
included in the IJ’s written decision--which the BIA corrected--do not warrant a
remand. See United States v. Timley, 507 F.3d 1125, 1131 (8th Cir. 2007) (declining
to remand case where it would be futile and waste of judicial resources).
Accordingly, we deny the petition. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --