United States of America v. Scott Allen Johnson

12-4018Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31 de jan. de 2014

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-3046
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Scott Allen Johnson
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield
____________
Submitted: December 26, 2013
Filed: January 7, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Scott Johnson appeals the sentence imposed by the district court after he1
pleaded guilty to a drug offense. On appeal, Johnson’s counsel has moved to
The Honorable Greg Kays, United States District Judge for the Western1
District of Missouri.

-- 1 of 2 --

withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
arguing that the sentence is substantively unreasonable.
Upon careful review, we conclude that Johnson’s sentence is not substantively
unreasonable. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en
banc) (appellate review of sentencing decision); United States v. Zauner, 688 F.3d
426, 429-30 (8th Cir. 2012) (when district court varies downward from presumptively
reasonable Guidelines sentence, it is nearly inconceivable that court abused its
discretion in not varying downward even further). Further, having independently
reviewed the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we
find no nonfrivolous issues. Therefore, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. The
judgment is affirmed.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.