United States of America v. Cassandra Lynn Dismang

12-2800Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30 de mai. de 2014

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-3574
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Cassandra Lynn Dismang
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield
____________
Submitted: May 1, 2014
Filed: May 6, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Cassandra Lynn Dismang directly appeals the district court’s1 judgment
revoking her supervised release and sentencing her to 15 months in prison. After
1The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.

-- 1 of 2 --

careful review, this court concludes that the district court did not clearly err in finding
that Dismang had violated the conditions of her supervised release, and did not abuse
its discretion by revoking her supervised release. See United States v. Miller, 557
F.3d 910, 914 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). This court also concludes that the
district court committed no procedural sentencing error, and the 15-month sentence,
which was below the Guidelines range and was the sentence Dismang requested, was
not substantively unreasonable. See id. at 915-17 (discussing procedural-error and
substantive-reasonableness tests); see also United States v. McCully, 407 F.3d 931,
934 (8th Cir. 2005) (where defendant received sentence at bottom of Guidelines range
as requested, she cannot challenge reasonableness of sentence on appeal).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.