Keith Brown v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-3759
___________________________
Keith Brown
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith
____________
Submitted: August 7, 2014
Filed: August 15, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

Keith Brown appeals the district court’s order affirming the denial of1
supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. Following de novo
review, see Myers v. Colvin, 721 F.3d 521, 524 (8th Cir. 2013), we conclude that the
administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) credibility analysis was proper, that the residual
functional capacity determination was supported by the record, and that the
vocational expert’s testimony that Brown could perform a significant number of jobs
existing in the national economy was based on a properly phrased hypothetical
question and constituted substantial evidence to support the ALJ’s assessment, see
Buckner v. Astrue, 646 F.3d 549, 560-61 (8th Cir. 2011).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the1
Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --