Eugene H. Mathison v. United States of America

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-4285
___________________________
Eugene H. Mathison
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
___________________________
No. 16-4286
___________________________
Eugene H. Mathison
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeals from United States District Court
for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls
____________
Submitted: July 18, 2017
Filed: July 26, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________

-- 1 of 2 --

Before COLLOTON, MURPHY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated cases, Eugene Mathison appeals following the district
court’s denial of his petitions for coram nobis relief. Upon careful review, we1
conclude that the district court properly denied relief. See United States v.
Camacho-Bordes, 94 F.3d 1168, 1173 (8th Cir. 1996) (standard of review; coram
nobis writ should be granted only under circumstances compelling such action to
achieve justice and to correct errors of most fundamental character); Azzone v.
United States, 341 F.2d 417, 419-20 (8th Cir. 1965) (per curiam) (coram nobis
petitioner not entitled to review of issues that were considered and resolved either on
direct appeal or in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the1
District of South Dakota.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --