Gamada Ahmed Hussein v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III, U.S. Attorney General

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-2513
___________________________
Gamada Ahmed Hussein,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
Jefferson B. Sessions, III, U.S. Attorney General; U.S. Department of Justice;
Christopher Wray, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation; John Does,1
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: March 7, 2018
Filed: March 21, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
Christopher Wray is substituted for his predecessor under Federal Rule of1
Appellate Procedure 43(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

PER CURIAM.
Gamada Hussein appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights action2
for failure to state a claim and lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Upon de novo
review, we conclude that even assuming the district court had jurisdiction to consider
Hussein’s claim under the Privacy Act, the complaint failed to state a claim, and we
affirm the dismissal of the remaining claims for the reasons stated by the district
court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the2
District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
Steven E. Rau, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --