United States of America v. Roger Lee Willis, also known as Bo Willis

16-2654Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31 de mai. de 2018

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-3410
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Roger Lee Willis, also known as Bo Willis
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith
____________
Submitted: May 9, 2018
Filed: May 14, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Roger Lee Willis appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised1
release and imposing a 24-month sentence. His counsel has moved for leave to
The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for1
the Western District of Arkansas.

-- 1 of 2 --

withdraw, and has submitted a brief raising issues as to whether the evidence was
insufficient to support a finding that he possessed methamphetamine, and that the
sentence is substantively unreasonable.
After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not
clearly err in finding that Willis had constructive possession of methamphetamine
based on the evidence presented. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); United States v. Miller,
557 F.3d 910, 914 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). We also conclude that the
district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Willis, as it properly
considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors; there was no indication that it overlooked
a relevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors,
see United States v. Johnson, 827 F.3d 740, 744 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard of review);
United States v. David, 682 F.3d 1074, 1077 (8th Cir. 2012); and the sentence was
within the Guidelines range, see United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th
Cir. 2014).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.