Donald Morgan v. Michael Robinson

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-1769
___________________________
Julio Soc-Morales
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
William P. Barr, Attorney General of United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: March 11, 2019
Filed: March 18, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Guatemalan citizen Julio Soc-Morales petitions for review of an order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the decision of an

-- 1 of 2 --

immigration judge, which denied him withholding of removal. Having jurisdiction1
under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, this court affirms.
This court concludes that substantial evidence supports the denial of
withholding of removal because Soc-Morales did not show a clear probability that his
life or freedom would be threatened because of one of the five protected grounds. See
8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3)(A) (protected grounds include race, religion, nationality,
membership in a particular social group, and political opinion); De Castro-Gutierrez
v. Holder, 713 F.3d 375, 379 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review); Quinonez-Perez
v. Holder, 635 F.3d 342, 345 (8th Cir. 2011) (burden of proof). The group Soc-
Morales proposed, and the testimony he provided in support of that group, did not
implicate a particular social group. See Mayorga-Rosa v. Sessions, 888 F.3d 379, 383
(8th Cir. 2018) (petitioner must prove his social group was (1) composed of members
who share a common immutable characteristic, (2) defined with particularity, and (3)
socially distinct); see also Matul-Hernandez v. Holder, 685 F.3d 707, 711-13 (8th
Cir. 2012); Gaitan v. Holder, 671 F.3d 678, 682 (8th Cir. 2012).
Because Soc-Morales did not establish membership in a particular social group,
this court declines to address his other arguments. See Mayorga-Rosa, 888 F.3d at
385.
The petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The denial of asylum and relief under the Convention Against Torture is not1
before the panel. See Agha v. Holder, 743 F.3d 609, 616 (8th Cir. 2014).
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --