Byron Dale v. Steven Mnuchin; President Donald Trump

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-3193
___________________________
Byron Dale; Greg Soderberg; Ayrlahn Johnson; David Pich; The Citizens of the
United States
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants
v.
Steven Mnuchin; President Donald Trump
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: March 26, 2019
Filed: March 29, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

Byron Dale appeals the district court’s dismissal of his pro se complaint.1
Having carefully reviewed the record and Dale’s arguments on appeal, we conclude
the court did not err in dismissing the complaint. See Laclede Gas Co. v. St. Charles
Cnty., Mo., 713 F.3d 413, 417 (8th Cir. 2013) (de novo review of dismissal for lack
of subject matter jurisdiction). We also note that, as only Dale signed the notice of
appeal, the other plaintiffs are not appellants in this court. See Scarrella v. Midwest
Fed. Savings and Loan, 536 F.2d 1207, 1209 (8th Cir. 1976) (per curiam) (NOA that
purported to be on behalf of all plaintiffs but was signed by only one pro se plaintiff
was not effective for those who did not sign).
______________________________
The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the1
District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
Leo I. Brisbois, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --