United States of America v. David Gabriel Morago

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-3635
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
David Gabriel Morago
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport
____________
Submitted: August 30, 2019
Filed: September 17, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate David Morago pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement, in
which he waived many rights, including the right to file a motion under 18 U.S.C.

-- 1 of 2 --

§ 3582(c)(2). He now appeals after the district court denied his renewed motion for1
a sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2). His counsel has moved to withdraw, and
has submitted a brief acknowledging the plea agreement contained a waiver of the
right to seek § 3582(c)(2) relief, but challenging the voluntariness of that waiver; and
arguing Morago is eligible for a sentence reduction.
Upon careful review, we conclude the record shows Morago knowingly and
voluntarily entered into the plea agreement, including the § 3582(c)(2) waiver. Cf.
United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (applying de novo review
to validity and applicability of appeal waiver); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886,
889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (appeal waiver will be enforced if appeal falls within
scope of waiver, defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into waiver and plea
agreement, and enforcing waiver would not result in miscarriage of justice). As the
§ 3582(c)(2) waiver is valid, we conclude the district court did not err in denying
Morago’s renewed motion. See Freeman v. United States, 564 U.S. 522, 541 (2011)
(Sotomayor, J., concurring in the judgment) (noting if the government wants to ensure
a defendant’s term of imprisonment will not be reduced, it can negotiate with such
defendant to waive the right to seek a sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2)).
Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm.
______________________________
The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the1
Southern District of Iowa.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --