United States of America v. Bradley E. Turner

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-1824
___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Bradley E. Turner,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport
____________
Submitted: September 4, 2019
Filed: September 9, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________

-- 1 of 2 --

PER CURIAM.
Bradley Turner appeals after the district court revoked his supervised release1
and sentenced him within the calculated Guidelines range. His counsel has filed a
brief challenging the reasonableness of the sentence and seeking to withdraw.
We conclude that the district court imposed a substantively reasonable
revocation sentence, as there is no indication that the court overlooked a relevant
factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a
clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v.
McGhee, 869 F.3d 703, 705 (8th Cir. 2017) (per curiam) (substantive reasonableness
of revocation sentence is reviewed under same abuse-of-discretion standard applied
to initial sentencing decisions); United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461–62 (8th
Cir. 2009) (en banc) (discussing substantive reasonableness). Accordingly, we affirm
the judgment, and we grant counsel permission to withdraw.
______________________________
The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the1
Southern District of Iowa.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --