19-2745•United States v. Arturo Leal-Monroy
19-2745Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit26 de fev. de 2021
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 20-1848
___________________________
Abdirahman Dayib Ahmed
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General of United States1
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: January 27, 2021
Filed: February 1, 2021
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, BENTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
1Robert M. Wilkinson has been appointed to serve as Acting Attorney General
of the United States, and is substituted as respondent pursuant to Federal Rule of
Appellate Procedure 43(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
Abdirahman Dayib Ahmed, a native and citizen of Somalia, petitions for
review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which upheld an
immigration judge’s denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under
the Convention Against Torture (CAT), after the BIA reversed the immigration
judge’s grant of cancellation of removal and remanded for further proceedings. After
careful review, we conclude that Ahmed waived any challenge to the denial of
asylum, withholding, or CAT relief because he failed to advance any argument that
the agency erred in denying such relief. See Chay-Velasquez v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d
751, 756 (8th Cir. 2004). We further conclude that Ahmed failed to fully
administratively exhaust the issues raised in his brief, and we therefore do not reach
those arguments. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1); Lasu v. Barr, 970 F.3d 960, 964-65 (8th
Cir. 2020); Frango v. Gonzales, 437 F.3d 726, 728 (8th Cir. 2006). In any event, we
lack jurisdiction to review a challenge to his arrest, see Bah v. Cangemi, 548 F.3d
680, 683 n.3 (8th Cir. 2008), and his remaining arguments are either foreclosed by
this court’s precedent, Ali v. Barr, 924 F.3d 983, 985-86 (8th Cir. 2019), or not
supported by the record. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.