Andrew Erik Heiderscheid v. Dakota County Sheriff's Office

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 20-3091
___________________________
Andrew Erik Heiderscheid
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Dakota County Sheriff's Office; Deputy Winfrey; Deputy Arturo Herrera; Deputy
Smith; Deputy Kent Themmes; Deputy John Doe; Deputy Jane Doe, Names of all
the people the suit is against, Individually and in their official capacities; Jacob
Schak; Tina Tyler; Ryan Fitzhenry; Julienne Oppong
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: May 21, 2021
Filed: May 26, 2021
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and ERICKSON Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Andrew Heiderscheid appeals the district
court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment. After careful review of the record and
the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Whitson v. Stone
Cnty. Jail, 602 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review). Accordingly, we
affirm.2 See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Leo I.
Brisbois, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
2Heiderscheid’s opening brief includes a motion “ask[ing] the Court to grant
him leave from adding supplemental briefing.” That motion is denied as moot.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --