United States of America v. Eleanor Repper

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-1606
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Eleanor Repper
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
____________
Submitted: July 19, 2022
Filed: July 22, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Eleanor Repper appeals after the district court1 revoked her supervised release
and sentenced her to a term of imprisonment within the advisory Sentencing
1The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas.

-- 1 of 2 --

Guidelines range. Her counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence.
We conclude that the revocation sentence was not unreasonable, as there is no
indication that the court failed to consider a relevant factor, gave significant weight
to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in
weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 922-24
(8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review); United States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110
(8th Cir. 2008) (revocation sentence within Guidelines range is accorded presumption
of substantive reasonableness on appeal). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion
to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --