United States of America v. William Long

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 23-2498
___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
William Long
Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
____________
Submitted: February 12, 2024
Filed: March 8, 2024
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, Chief Judge, BENTON and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
The district court1 sentenced William Long to 120 months in prison after he
pleaded guilty to distributing methamphetamine. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1),
(b)(1)(C). He argues that his sentence is substantively unreasonable.
1 The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas.

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
We conclude otherwise. See United States v. Harris, 960 F.3d 1103, 1106
(8th Cir. 2020) (reviewing for an abuse of discretion). The record establishes that
the district court sufficiently considered the statutory sentencing factors, 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a), and did not rely on an improper factor or commit a clear error in
judgment. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461–62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en
banc). It discussed several mitigating factors, including Long’s family history,
mental-health issues, and acceptance of responsibility, and varied downward from
the recommended range. Just because Long hoped they would be given more weight
does not mean the court abused its discretion. See United States v. Moua, 895 F.3d
556, 560 (8th Cir. 2018) (per curiam); see also United States v. McKanry, 628 F.3d
1010, 1022 (8th Cir. 2011) (explaining that it is “nearly inconceivable” that a district
court abused its discretion by refusing to vary downward even further (citation
omitted)). We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --