Ahmad Daniel v. Honeywell International Inc.

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 23-3476
___________________________
Ahmad Daniel
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Honeywell International Inc.; Katie Lorentzen; Dawn C. Valdivia; Tara Hill; Kyle Swatfager
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: July 15, 2024
Filed: August 2, 2024
[Unpublished]
____________
Before KELLY, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Ahmad Daniel appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se employment
discrimination action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments
1The Honorable Eric C. Tostrud, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.

-- 1 of 2 --

on appeal, we conclude that dismissal was warranted based on Daniel’s failure to
comply with federal and local rules. See Mangan v. Weinberger, 848 F.2d 909, 911
(8th Cir. 1988) (reviewing dismissal for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 for
abuse of discretion); see also Nw. Bank & Tr. Co. v. First Ill. Nat’l Bank, 354 F.3d
721, 725 (8th Cir. 2003) (reviewing district court’s application of its local rules for
abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny
Daniel’s pending motion.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --