United States v. Eric Klase

22-3156Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31 de out. de 2024

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-1318
___________________________
Hollis J. Larson
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP); Lucinda Jesson, All sued in their
individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities; Cal Ludeman,
All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official
capacities; Dennis Benson, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously
sued in their official capacities; Erik Skon, All sued in their individual capacities,
and variously sued in their official capacities; Greg Carlson, All sued in their
individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities; Scott Benoit,
All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official
capacities; David Prescott, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously
sued in their official capacities; Tim Gorr, All sued in their individual capacities,
and variously sued in their official capacities; David Bornus, All sued in their
individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities; Shelby
Richardson, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their
official capacities; Jannine Hebert, All sued in their individual capacities, and
variously sued in their official capacities; Lou Stender, All sued in their individual
capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities; Nancy Johnston, All sued
in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities; Terry
Kneisel, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official
capacities; Barry Anderson, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously
sued in their official capacities; Marnie Dollinger, All sued in their individual
capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities; Gary Grimm, All sued in
their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities; Leslie
Barfknecht, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their
official capacities; Jim Lind, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously
sued in their official capacities; Steve Sajdak, All sued in their individual

-- 1 of 4 --

capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities; Susan Johnson, All sued
in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities; Laurie
Severson, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their
official capacities; David Paulson, All sued in their individual capacities, and
variously sued in their official capacities; Ralph Schmidt, All sued in their
individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities; Scott Sutton,
All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official
capacities; Ann Linkert, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued
in their official capacities; Phil Wilder, All sued in their individual capacities, and
variously sued in their official capacities; Kevin Moser, All sued in their
individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities; Elizabeth
Barbo, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official
capacities; Tom Lundquist, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously
sued in their official capacities; Ann Zimmerman, All sued in their individual
capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities; Debbie D. Thao, All sued
in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities; Marie
Skalko, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official
capacities; Teresa Knies, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued
in their official capacities; Tara Osborne, All sued in their individual capacities,
and variously sued in their official capacities; Julianna Beavens, All sued in their
individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities; Yvette
Andersen, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their
official capacities; Joanne Christenson, All sued in their individual capacities, and
variously sued in their official capacities; Jon Hibbard, All sued in their individual
capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities; Blake Carey, All sued in
their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities; Thane
Murphy, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official
capacities; David Ferrian, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously
sued in their official capacities; Anita L. Moonen, All sued in their individual
capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities; Julie Rose, All sued in
their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities; Brian
Ninneman, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their
official capacities; John Does, All sued in their individual capacities, and
variously sued in their official capacities; Jane Does, All sued in their individual
-2-

-- 2 of 4 --

capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities; Daniel Storkamp, All
sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: October 2, 2024
Filed: October 7, 2024
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Minnesota civil detainee Hollis Larson appeals the district court’s1 dismissal
of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Following a careful review, we conclude that
the district court did not err in dismissing the action. See Plymouth Cty. v. Merscorp,
Inc., 774 F.3d 1155, 1158 (8th Cir. 2014) (de novo review of grant of motion to
dismiss).
We agree that Larson’s general claims about punitive conditions in the
Minnesota Sex Offender Program were precluded by the resolution of Karsjens v.
Harpstead, 74 F.4th 561 (8th Cir. 2023). See Cooper v. Fed. Reserve Bank of
Richmond, 467 U.S. 867, 874, 880 (1984) (judgment in a class action is binding on
1The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Dulce J.
Foster, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-3-

-- 3 of 4 --

class members in any subsequent litigation and the principles of claim and issue
preclusion apply). To the extent Larson raised claims based on his specific
allegations about force used against him, and medical care provided to him, related
to a July 2011 incident, the district court did not err in finding that he failed to state
a claim, and that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity. See Stone v. Harry,
364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004) (although pro se complaints are to be construed
liberally, they still must allege sufficient facts to support claims advanced; court will
not supply additional facts or construct legal theory for plaintiff); LaCross v. City of
Duluth, 713 F.3d 1155, 1157 (8th Cir. 2013) (qualified immunity shields government
officials from liability in a section 1983 action unless the official’s conduct violates
a clearly established constitutional or statutory right).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-4-

-- 4 of 4 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.