Tomika Hindson v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-1331
___________________________
Tomika Hindson
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Central
____________
Submitted: July 28, 2025
Filed: July 31, 2025
[Unpublished]
____________
Before ERICKSON, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Tomika Hindson appeals following the district court’s1 dismissal of her pro se
complaint for lack of standing. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district
1The Honorable Stephen H. Locher, United States District Judge for the
Southern District of Iowa.

-- 1 of 2 --

court did not err in dismissing the case. See In re Polaris Mktg., Sales Pracs., &
Prods. Liab. Litig., 9 F.4th 793, 796 (8th Cir. 2021) (de novo review of dismissal for
lack of standing). We modify the dismissal to be without prejudice. See Cnty. of
Mille Lacs v. Benjamin, 361 F.3d 460, 464-65 (8th Cir. 2004) (dismissal on
jurisdictional grounds must be without prejudice). We affirm the judgment as
modified. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --