United States of America v. Matthew Van Lith

12-30118Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit15 de mar. de 2013

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MATTHEW VAN LITH,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 12-30118
D.C. No. 3:11-cr-00176-EJL-2
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KAILEY DOAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 12-30119
D.C. No. 3:11-cr-00176-EJL-1
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Idaho
Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, Presiding
FILED
MAR 15 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
2
Submitted March 5, 2013**
Seattle, Washington
Before: FERNANDEZ, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Appellants Matthew Van Lith and Kailey Doan, who were convicted of
marijuana possession at an Idaho campground, challenge the district court’s denial
of their motions to suppress.
The district court properly denied the motions to suppress because, under the
totality of circumstances, the Bureau of Land Management ranger “had a
particularized and objective basis for suspecting” that Van Lith and Doan were
engaged in criminal activity. United States v. Basher, 629 F.3d 1161, 1165 (9th
Cir. 2011) (citation omitted).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.