Zhongyou Zhou v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

11-71766Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2 de abr. de 2013

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The Honorable Frederic Block, Senior District Judge, United States**
District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ZHONGYOU ZHOU,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 11-71766
Agency No. A099-912-090
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted December 7, 2012
San Francisco, California
Before: TROTT and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and BLOCK, Senior District
Judge.**
FILED
APR 02 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Petitioner Zhongyou Zhou (Zhou) challenges the decision of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying Zhou’s application for asylum, withholding of
removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).
Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that the persecution
suffered by Zhou was not on account of a protected ground. The record does not
compel a conclusion that Zhou’s persecutors imputed an anti-government political
opinion to him. Rather, the conflict between Zhou and his employer was personal.
On this record, the denial of asylum must stand. See Gu v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d
1014, 1018 (9th Cir. 2006) (articulating standard). Zhou’s “failure to satisfy the
lesser standard of proof required to establish eligibility for asylum necessarily
results in a failure to demonstrate eligibility for withholding of [removal] as well.”
Fisher v. INS, 79 F.3d 955, 961 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc).
Neither does the record compel a conclusion that Zhou is entitled to CAT
relief. Although Zhou was beaten during his arrest, the beating did not rise to the
level of torture. See Ridore v. Holder, 696 F.3d 907, 912 (9th Cir. 2012)
(describing torture as “severe physical or mental pain or suffering”); see also 8
C.F.R. § 208.18(a)(2) (“Torture is an extreme form of cruel and inhuman treatment

-- 2 of 3 --

3
and does not include lesser forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment . . .”).
PETITION DENIED.

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.