In re: WALTER R. PINEDA v. Bank of America Na;

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: WALTER R. PINEDA,
Debtor,
WALTER R. PINEDA,
Appellant,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA NA; et al.,
Appellees.
No. 13-60071
BAP No. 11-1719
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
Markell, Dunn, and Jury, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding
Submitted April 7, 2015**
Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
FILED
APR 28 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

Walter R. Pineda appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s
(“BAP”) order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order abstaining from deciding an
adversary proceeding against appellees. We dismiss.
We lack jurisdiction to review the bankruptcy court’s decision to abstain
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(c)(1). See 28 U.S.C. § 1334(d).
We reject Pineda’s contention that the BAP violated his due process rights in
the handling of his appeal.
DISMISSED.
13-60071 2

-- 2 of 2 --