United States of America v. Julio Omar Rocha-Miranda, a.k.a. Julio O. Rocha Miranda

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JULIO OMAR ROCHA-MIRANDA,
a.k.a. Julio O. Rocha Miranda,
Defendant - Appellant.
Nos. 14-10083
14-10084
D.C. No. 4:13-cr-01315-RCC
4:10-cr-02852-RCC
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Kimberly A. Moore, Circuit Judge, Presiding**
Submitted May 13, 2015***
Before: LEAVY, CALLAHAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Julio Omar Rocha-Miranda appeals his guilty-
plea conviction and 21-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of
FILED
MAY 19 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The Honorable Kimberly A. Moore, United States Circuit Judge for
the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

8 U.S.C. § 1326; and the revocation of supervised release and 9-month consecutive
sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), Rocha-Miranda’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds
for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
provided Rocha-Miranda the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No
pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
14-10083 & 14-10084 2

-- 2 of 2 --