United States of America v. Ronald Joseph Fourhorns

15-30021Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit18 de set. de 2015

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RONALD JOSEPH FOURHORNS,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 15-30021
D.C. No. 4:14-cr-00052-BMM-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Brian M. Morris, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 16, 2015**
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Ronald Joseph Fourhourns appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 210-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction
for bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Fourhorns’s counsel has filed a brief stating that
FILED
SEP 18 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
record. We have provided Fourhorns the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental
brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Fourhorns has waived the right to appeal his sentence. Because the record
discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver, we dismiss Fourhorns’s
appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.