United States of America v. Daniel Reyes-Zarate

14-50450Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit19 de out. de 2015

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DANIEL REYES-ZARATE,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 14-50450
D.C. No. 3:13-cr-04121-LAB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 14, 2015**
Before: SILVERMAN, BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Daniel Reyes-Zarate appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 72-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for
being a removed alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
OCT 19 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

Reyes-Zarate contends that the district court erred in applying a 16-level
enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) because his prior conviction
under California Penal Code § 211 is not a crime of violence. Reyes-Zarate’s
argument is foreclosed. See United States v. Flores-Mejia, 687 F.3d 1213, 1216
(9th Cir. 2012) (a conviction under California Penal Code § 211 is a categorical
crime of violence); see also Miller v. Gammie, 335 F.3d 889, 893 (9th Cir. 2003)
(en banc) (three-judge panel is bound by circuit precedent unless that precedent is
“clearly irreconcilable” with intervening higher authority).
AFFIRMED.
14-50450 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.