United States of America v. Armando Gomez-Hernandez, a.k.a. Carlos Atondo, a.k.a. Mario Gomez

15-30264Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit20 de jun. de 2016

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ARMANDO GOMEZ-HERNANDEZ,
a.k.a. Carlos Atondo, a.k.a. Mario Gomez,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 15-30264
D.C. No. 9:15-cr-00005-DLC
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 14, 2016**
Before: BEA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Armando Gomez-Hernandez appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for
illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction under 28
FILED
JUN 20 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm, but remand to correct the judgment.
Gomez-Hernandez contends that the district court violated the Sixth
Amendment by increasing the statutory maximum sentence for his offense on the
basis of a prior felony conviction that was not admitted by him or found by a jury.
As Gomez-Hernandez concedes, this argument is foreclosed by the Supreme
Court’s holding in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See
United States v. Leyva-Martinez, 632 F.3d 568, 569 (9th Cir. 2011) (“We have
repeatedly held . . . that Almendarez-Torres is binding unless it is expressly
overruled by the Supreme Court.”).
In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062
(9th Cir. 2000), we remand this case to the district court with instructions that it
delete from the judgment the reference to § 1326(b)(1). See United States v.
Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir. 2000) (remanding sua sponte to
delete the reference to § 1326(b)).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.
15-30264 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.