United States of America v. Robert Vargas

15-10282Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit22 de ago. de 2016

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ROBERT VARGAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-10282
D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00326-MCE
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 16, 2016**
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Robert Vargas appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the
180-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to
distribute and to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of
21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846; possession with intent to distribute MDMA, in
FILED
AUG 22 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a
drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). We dismiss.
Vargas contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of an
alleged overstatement to his criminal history and the disparity between his sentence
and that of his codefendant. The government argues that this appeal should be
dismissed based on an appeal waiver contained in the parties’ plea agreement.
Reviewing de novo, see United States v. Lightfoot, 626 F.3d 1092, 1094 (9th Cir.
2010), we dismiss. Vargas gave up the right to appeal his sentence as long as it did
not exceed “the top of the applicable guideline range.” Whether the applicable
guideline range is the 195-228 month range calculated by the court at sentencing,
or the 181-211 month range calculated in the plea agreement and that Vargas now
suggests the court should have used, the appeal waiver bars Vargas’s appeal of his
180-month sentence.
DISMISSED.
15-10282 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.