Lorenzo Cabrera v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LORENZO CABRERA,
Petitioner,
v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney
General,
Respondent.
No. 15-73938
Agency No. A079-536-567
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of an
Immigration Judge’s Decision
Submitted June 26, 2017**
Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Lorenzo Cabrera, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.31(a) that he did
not have a reasonable fear of torture and thus is not entitled to relief from his
reinstated removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
JUL 3 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 15-73938
for substantial evidence the IJ’s factual findings. Andrade-Garcia v. Lynch, 828
F.3d 829, 836 (9th Cir. 2016). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Cabrera failed to
demonstrate a reasonable possibility of torture by or with the consent or
acquiescence of the government of Mexico. See Zheng v. Holder, 644 F.3d 829,
835-36 (9th Cir. 2011) (fear of torture speculative); Dhital v. Mukasey, 532 F.3d
1044, 1051-52 (9th Cir. 2008) (evidence did not indicate a particularized threat of
torture to petitioner).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --