Anthony Gerard Lewis v. M. COLVIN, Senior Librarian; K. J. ALLEN, Appeals Examiner; S. MIRANDA, L.T.A.

17-15501Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit22 de dez. de 2017

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANTHONY GERARD LEWIS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
M. COLVIN, Senior Librarian; K. J.
ALLEN, Appeals Examiner; S.
MIRANDA, L.T.A.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-15501
D.C. No. 5:15-cv-03335-BLF
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Beth Labson Freeman, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 18, 2017**
Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Anthony Gerard Lewis, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the
district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging
FILED
DEC 22 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

defendants denied him access to the courts. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We review de novo. Jones v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 968 F.2d 937, 940 (9th
Cir. 1992). We affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment on Lewis’s access-to-
courts claim because Lewis failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to
whether he suffered any actual injury. See Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 348-51
(1996) (setting forth the elements of an access-to-courts claim and the actual injury
requirement).
AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.