United States of America v. Aaron Scott Pruett

16-56858Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit9 de jan. de 2018

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
AARON SCOTT PRUETT,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-56858
D.C. Nos. 3:16-cv-01561-CAB
3:96-cr-00331-CAB-1
Southern District of California,
San Diego
ORDER
Before: GRABER, MURGUIA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
The separate concurrence to the memorandum disposition filed November
30, 2017, is amended as follows:
On page 2, line 17 of the concurrence, change "In sum, even if we assume"
to "Even if we assume"; on page 3, at the end of line 5 of the concurrence, add the
citation: "Beckles v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 886, 897–98 (Ginsburg, J.,
concurring)."
With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny Appellant’s petition for
panel rehearing and rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no
judge of the court has requested a vote on it.
Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED.
FILED
JAN 9 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

No further petitions for panel rehearing or for rehearing en banc may be
filed.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.