JUAN JR CABUJAT TEOCO and ERLINDA HISO TEOCO v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JUAN JR CABUJAT TEOCO and
ERLINDA HISO TEOCO,
Petitioners,
v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney
General,
Respondent.
No. 16-72462
Agency Nos. A099-735-203
A099-735-204
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 13, 2018**
Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Juan Jr Cabujat Teoco and Erlinda Hiso Teoco, natives and citizens of the
Philippines, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’
(“BIA”) order denying their motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
FEB 21 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 16-72462
8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to
reconsider. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny
the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider,
where petitioners did not show the BIA made an error of law or fact in its prior
decision. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (“A motion to reconsider shall state the reasons for
the motion by specifying the errors of fact or law in the prior Board decision and
shall be supported by pertinent authority.”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --