United States of America v. David Orlando Ruiz-Carpintero, a.k.a. David Hernandez Hernandez, a.k.a. Jose…

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
DAVID ORLANDO RUIZ-CARPINTERO,
a.k.a. David Hernandez Hernandez, a.k.a.
Jose Hernandez Hernandez, a.k.a. David
Orlando Ruiz, a.k.a. David Ruiz-Carpintero,
Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 17-10372
17-10373
D.C. Nos. 4:17-cr-00218-RM
2:14-cr-00177-RM
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Rosemary Marquez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 15, 2018**
Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, David Orlando Ruiz-Carpintero appeals his
guilty-plea conviction and 41-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in
violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
MAY 18 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 17-10372 & 17-10373
concurrent 8-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ruiz-Carpintero’s counsel has filed a brief stating
that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
record. We have provided Ruiz-Carpintero the opportunity to file a pro se
supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been
filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief in these direct appeals.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --