United States of America v. Guillermo Vallejo-Moreno

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
GUILLERMO VALLEJO-MORENO,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 18-50100
D.C. No. 3:14-cr-01252-W
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Thomas J. Whelan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 22, 2018**
Before: SILVERMAN, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
Guillermo Vallejo-Moreno appeals from the sentence of twelve months and
one day imposed upon revocation of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Vallejo-Moreno’s counsel has filed a brief stating
that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
OCT 29 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 18-50100
record. We have provided Vallejo-Moreno the opportunity to file a pro se
supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been
filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --