ANDRES AMADOR RAMIREZ CALDERON, AKA Andres Ramirez v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANDRES AMADOR RAMIREZ
CALDERON, AKA Andres Ramirez,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 18-73303
Agency No. A214-375-026
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 15, 2019**
Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Andres Amador Ramirez Calderon, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his
motion to remand. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for
abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to remand. Romero-Ruiz v.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
OCT 22 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 18-73303
Mukasey, 538 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Ramirez Calderon’s motion
to remand for failure to show prima facie eligibility for cancellation of removal,
where he did not provide any evidence of exceptional and extremely unusual
hardship to his wife. See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1080 (9th Cir.
2013) (BIA may deny the motion for failure to demonstrate prima facie eligibility
for the underlying relief); 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D) (requiring a showing of
exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative for
cancellation of removal).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --