JUAN RODRIGUEZ-COMACHO, AKA Juan Rodriguez-Camacho v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JUAN RODRIGUEZ-COMACHO, AKA
Juan Rodriguez-Camacho,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 18-72327
Agency No. A208-559-504
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 18, 2019**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Juan Rodriguez-Comacho, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for deferral of removal
under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8
U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
NOV 25 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 18-72327
Avendano-Hernandez v. Lynch, 800 F.3d 1072, 1078 (9th Cir. 2015). We deny the
petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because
Rodriguez-Comacho failed to show it is more likely than not he will be tortured by
or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico. See
Delgado-Ortiz v. Holder, 600 F.3d 1148, 1152 (9th Cir. 2010) (generalized
evidence of violence and crime in Mexico was not particular to the petitioner and
insufficient to establish eligibility for CAT relief).
We reject Rodriguez-Comacho’s contentions that IJ failed to consider
evidence and used an incorrect legal standard.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --