Metlife Home Loans LLC v. River Glider Avenue Trust

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
METLIFE HOME LOANS LLC,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RIVER GLIDER AVENUE TRUST,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 21-15564
D.C. No.
2:17-cv-00215-JCM-BNW
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 11, 2022**
Pasadena, California
Before: WALLACE, BOGGS,*** and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
River Glider Avenue Trust appeals from the district court’s summary
judgment in favor of MetLife Home Loans LLC. Reviewing de novo, we affirm
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
*** The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.
FILED
JAN 13 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2
because River Glider has failed to present any evidence that the HOA expressly
allocated the homeowners’ partial payments to any specific portion of its lien, and
thus has failed to establish a genuine dispute of material fact. See Fed. Home Loan
Mortg. Corp. v. SFR Invs. Pool 1, LLC, 893 F.3d 1136, 1144 (9th Cir. 2018)
(setting forth summary judgment standard).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --