Lisa Guffey and Christine Smith v. Roslynn R. Mauskopf

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Filed: January 13, 2023
No. 20-5183
LISA GUFFEY AND CHRISTINE SMITH,
APPELLEES
v.
ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS
DIRECTOR OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES COURTS,
APPELLANT
Consolidated with 20-5208
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia
(No. 1:18-cv-01271)
On Petition for Rehearing En Banc
Before: SRINIVASAN, Chief Judge; HENDERSON**, MILLETT,
PILLARD*, WILKINS, KATSAS, RAO, WALKER, CHILDS, and PAN,
Circuit Judges

-- 1 of 3 --

2
O R D E R
Appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc and the
response thereto were circulated to the full court, and a vote
was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges eligible to
participate did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon
consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT:
Mark J. Langer, Clerk
BY: /s/
Daniel J. Reidy
Deputy Clerk
* Circuit Judge Pillard did not participate in this matter.
** Circuit Judge Henderson would grant the petition for
rehearing en banc. A statement by Circuit Judge Henderson,
dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, is attached.

-- 2 of 3 --

KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting
from the denial of rehearing en banc: For the reasons explained
in my panel dissent, which is hereby incorporated by reference
thereto, Guffey v. Mauskopf, 45 F.4th 442, 452–62 (D.C. Cir.
2022) (Henderson, J., dissenting), I dissent from the denial of
rehearing en banc.

-- 3 of 3 --