Noyes v. University Realty, Inc.

CourtListener 3327481Connappct8 de fev. de 1984

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

Per Curiam.

The appellant did not appear to argue this appeal on the date the case was assigned for hearing. Subsequently, a motion to reargue was denied by the court because we were not persuaded that the reasons given for the appellant’s absence warranted reargument.

Furthermore, a review of the record and briefs indicates that there was no error.

There is no error.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.