CourtListener 3327481•Noyes v. University Realty, Inc.
Texto completo
Per Curiam.
The appellant did not appear to argue this appeal on the date the case was assigned for hearing. Subsequently, a motion to reargue was denied by the court because we were not persuaded that the reasons given for the appellant’s absence warranted reargument.
Furthermore, a review of the record and briefs indicates that there was no error.
There is no error.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.